Showing 21 - 30 of 119
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002303479
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009522647
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005832595
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008644335
Abstract This paper reports the results of a telephone survey of state-level officials as to the influence of evaluations of three state welfare innovations: California's GAIN, New York's CAP, and Florida's Project Independence. The three experiments were known to those interviewed, yet they did...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008645598
"When evaluating a pilot or demonstration program, there are risks from drawing inferences from a single test. This paper reviews the experiences of replication efforts from demonstrations using randomized controlled trials in the initial evaluation and the replications. Although replications of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010699079
"When evaluating a pilot or demonstration program, there are risks from drawing inferences from a single test. This paper reviews the experiences of replication efforts from demonstrations using randomized controlled trials in the initial evaluation and the replications. Although replications of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010731986
This article presents a cost-benefit analysis of Britain's Employment Retention and Advancement (ERA) demonstration, which was evaluated through the first large-scale randomized control trial in the UK. ERA used a combination of job coaching and financial incentives in attempting to help...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010740709
"When evaluating a pilot or demonstration program, there are risks from drawing inferences from a single test. This paper reviews the experiences of replication efforts from demonstrations using randomized controlled trials in the initial evaluation and the replications. Although replications of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010710579
Of welfare-to-work programs evaluated by random assignment, two stand out as having exceptionally large estimated effects: one in Riverside, California, and the other in Portland, Oregon. The authors use data from 24 evaluations and the tools of meta-analysis to examine why. The findings...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011127267