This discussion is part two of a two-part series of discussions. Part one described the licensing analyst (analyst) use of the market approach to value intellectual property for license, sale, financing, and other purposes. In particular, part one of this discussion described the analyst's use...

Owner/operators often need to know the value of their intellectual property for transaction (sale or license), financing (sale/licenseback or collateralization), taxation (income or other), accounting (acquisition accounting or impairment testing), litigation (infringement or breach of...

Licensing executives often work with economists, forensic accountants, industry consultants, valuation analysts, damages analysts, and other third-party specialists (collectively referred to herein as analysts) to develop valuation, damages, or transfer price analyses related to an...

Licensing professionals and related professionals (hereinafter “analysts”) are often asked to conduct intellectual property valuations (or damages analyses or transfer price analysis) as part of a bankruptcy-related controversy. Part 1 of this three-part discussion considered all of the...

Intellectual property owner/operators often retain forensic accountants, financial advisors, industry consultants, licensing specialists, economists, and other professionals (collectively referred to herein as “analysts”) to perform valuation, damages, or transfer price analyses related to...

Owner/operators often retain specialized analysts to perform intellectual property valuation, damages, or transfer price analyses. These analyses may be performed for transaction, financing, taxation, planning, accounting, and litigation purposes. Outside of the intellectual property dispute...

Licensing executives and related professionals (hereinafter “analysts”) are often called on to conduct intellectual property valuation analyses (or damages analyses or transfer price analyses) within a bankruptcy context. Part One of this three-part discussion examined the elements (or...

This paper reports an experiment that evaluates three regimes for triggering the conversion of contingent capital bonds into equity: (a) a “regulator” regime, where socially motivated regulators make conversion decisions based on observed prices, (b) a “fixed trigger” regime where a...

A market experiment examines the capacity of price and information frictions to explain real responses to nominal price shocks. Results indicate that both price and information frictions impede the response to a nominal shock, as predicted by the standard dynamic adjustment models. Observed...

We report an experiment that evaluates three market‐based regimes for triggering the conversion of contingent capital bonds into equity: a “fixed‐trigger” regime, where a price threshold triggers mandatory conversion; a “regulator” regime, where regulators make conversion decisions...