Showing 1 - 10 of 36
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003521386
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009735792
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010246497
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011447630
We analyze a model where investors use a credit rating to decide whether to finance a firm. The rating quality depends on unobservable effort exerted by a credit rating agency (CRA). We study optimal compensation schemes for the CRA when a planner, the firm, or investors order the rating. Rating...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013084208
This paper analyzes a dynamic lending relationship where the borrower cannot be forced to make repayments, and the lender offers long-term contracts that are imperfectly enforced and repeatedly renegotiated. No commitment and full commitment by the lender are special cases of this model where...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013064322
We propose a model of asset management in which benchmarking arises endogenously, and analyze its unintended welfare consequences. Fund managers' portfolios are unobservable and they incur private costs in running them. Conditioning managers' compensation on a benchmark portfolio's performance...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012837972
This paper analyzes Markov equilibria in a model of strategic lending in which (i) agents cannot commit to long-term contracts, (ii) contracts are incomplete, and (iii) incumbent lenders can coordinate their actions. Default cycles occur endogenously over time along every equilibrium path. After...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012775497
We study the impact of evaluating the performance of asset managers relative to a benchmark portfolio on firms' investment, merger and IPO decisions. We introduce asset managers into an otherwise standard asset pricing model and show that firms that are part of the benchmark are effectively...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012906675
We argue that the pervasive practice of evaluating portfolio managers relative to a benchmark has real effects. Benchmarking generates additional, inelastic demand for assets inside the benchmark. This leads to a “benchmark inclusion subsidy:” a firm inside the benchmark values an investment...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012906786