Showing 1 - 10 of 69
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009571005
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009156517
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010473450
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011451068
We analyze the role of transaction costs in risk transfer markets. For example, when these markets are in their infancy, they are characterized by few contracts and high transaction costs. In this case, we show that only highly risk-averse buyers (e.g., hedgers) exist in the market alongside...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013104868
In traditional economic models of insurance, sellers typically employ a non-linear pricing scheme to elicit type information from buyers. In financial insurance contracts, such a policy is not possible since contracts are non-exclusive. In addition, counterparty risk in financial contracts can...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013107883
We provide a tractable model of counterparty risk in an intermediated risk transfer market, and analyze the consequences of this risk being private information. We show that unknown type information can be revealed when large trades are observable; however, the allocation is shown to be...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013007035
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011822438
What market features of financial risk transfer exacerbate counterparty risk? To analyze this, we formulate a model which elucidates important differences between financial risk transfer and traditional insurance, using the example of Credit Default Swaps (CDS). We allow for (heterogeneous)...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010906756
What market features of Credit Defaults Swaps (CDS) exacerbate counterparty risk? To answer this, we formulate a model which elucidates key differences between these and traditional insurance contracts. First, we allow for insurer insolvency with asymmetric information as to its probability. We...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013127453