Showing 61 - 70 of 168
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013440126
This paper documents a hallmark feature of China’s state capitalism as the state controlling the economy in a vertical structure: State-owned enterprises (SOEs) monopolize key industries in the upstream, whereas the downstream industries are largely open to private competition. We develop...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011133640
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012093186
Purpose: In today’s complex and challenging work environment, employees’ learning from errors has become critical to organizations’ survival and success. While the literature has highlighted the importance of inclusive leadership for learning behavior in organizations, research on how...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012066564
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012538617
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005492590
This paper examines the motivation and impact of corporate diversification in Chinese listed firms. We find that in local government owned-firms there is a non-linear relationship between the level of firm diversification and state ownership. As state ownership increases from zero, the level of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005585021
We investigate the (sell-side) analyst rankings of <italic>Institutional Investor</italic> (I/I) and <italic>The Wall Street Journal</italic> (WSJ), using data from 1993–2005. We find that factors with a primary component of recognition are the most important determinants of the rankings, although performance measures are...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10004983446
We investigate whether and how an exogenous and unprecedented improvement in non-U.S. firms’ financial reporting quality affects post-earnings-announcement drift (PEAD). We find that PEAD declines after the information shock, and this decrease is more pronounced for firms with fewer...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011266151
On March 29, 2010, the U.S. Supreme Court signaled its intention to geographically limit the reach of the U.S. securities antifraud regime and thus differentially exclude U.S.-listed foreign firms from the ambit of formal U.S. antifraud enforcement. We use this legal surprise as a natural...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011266152