Showing 1 - 10 of 81
We estimate the changes in US male labor market risk over the last three decades in a model of endogenous labor supply and job mobility. Across education groups permanent shocks to productivity have become more dispersed. Moreover, heterogeneity in pay across offered jobs has increased for...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012966057
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011719235
Using quarterly worker flow data of U.S. establishments, we find that an unexpected increase in uncertainty reduces hirings and quits, while it raises layoffs. This finding suggests that the real option effect of uncertainty is less important for employment decisions. Hence plants do not freeze...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010488510
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011719230
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011719232
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011705676
We estimate the changes in US male labor market risk over the last three decades in a model of endogenous labor supply and job mobility. Across education groups permanent shocks to productivity have become more dispersed. Moreover, heterogeneity in pay across offered jobs has increased for...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011653179
This paper quantitatively determines the asset limit in income support programs which minimizes consumption volatility in a lifecycle model with incomplete markets and idiosyncratic earnings risk. An asset limit allows allocating transfers to those households with the highest utility gains from...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010479004
This paper studies the savings and employment effects of the asset means-test in US income support programs using a structural life-cycle model with productivity, disability, and unemployment risk. An asset means-test incentivizes low-income households to hold few financial assets making them...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012432849
When employers face a trade-off between growing large and paying low wages—that is, when they have monopsony power—some productive employers will decide to acquire fewer customers, forgo sales, and remain small. These decisions have adverse consequences for aggregate labor productivity....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014083475