Similar Search Results

Strategy-Proof Preference Aggregation and the Anonymity-Neutrality Tradeoff

Athanasoglou, Stergios; Bonkoungou, Somouaoga; Ehlers, … - 2023

relation. For two alternatives and an odd number of agents, it follows from May’s Theorem that the majority aggregation rule is …

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014357423

How to choose a non-manipulable delegation?

Can, Burak; Csóka, Péter; Ergin, Emre - 2017

This paper analyzes how to choose a delegation, a committee to represent a society such as in a peace conference. We propose normative conditions and seek optimal, consistent, neutral, and non-manipulable ways to choose a delegation. We show that a class of threshold rules are characterized by...

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011944910

How to choose a delegation for a peace conference?

Can, Burak; Csóka, Péter; Ergin, Emre - 2017

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011637437

How to choose a fair delegation?

Can, Burak; Csóka, Péter; Ergin, Emre - In: Economic theory 72 (2021) 4, pp. 1339-1373

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012663439

Strategy-proofness and single-crossing

Saporiti, Alejandro - In: Theoretical economics : TE ; an open access journal in … 4 (2009) 2, pp. 127-163

This paper analyzes strategy-proof collective choice rules when individuals have single-crossing preferences on a finite and ordered set of social alternatives. It shows that a social choice rule is anonymous, unanimous, and strategy-proof on a maximal single-crossing domain if and only if it is...

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011699125

Chapter 59 Strategic aspects of political systems

Banks, Jeffrey S. - In: Handbook of game theory with economic applications : …, (pp. 2203-2228). 2002

Early results on the emptiness of the core and the majority-rule-chaos results led to the recognition of the importance of modeling institutional details in political processes. A sample of the literature on game-theoretic models of political phenomena that ensued is presented. In the case of...

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014024486

Respect for experts or respect for unanimity? : the liberal paradox in probabilistic opinion pooling

Herzberg, Frederik - 2014 - Preliminary and incompletet

rights. Dietrich and List (2008) have generalised this result to the setting of binary judgement aggregation. This paper …

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010366140

Voting and the Cardinal Aggregation of Judgments

Hillinger, Claude - 2004

The paper elaborates the idea that voting is an instance of the aggregation of judgments, this being a more general … concept than the aggregation of preferences. To aggregate judgments one must first measure them. I show that such aggregation … theory are either context dependent or subject to unreasonable restrictions. This is the real source of the diverse …

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014071630

The Median Rule in Judgement Aggregation

Nehring, Klaus; Pivato, Marcus - 2018

A judgement aggregation rule takes the views of a collection of voters over a set of interconected issues, and yields a … logically consistent collective view. The median rule is a judgement aggregation rule that selects the logically consistent view … issues on which they disagree). In the special case of preference aggregation, this is called the Kemeny rule. We show that …

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014116756

Implementation of optimal connection networks

Hougaard, Jens Leth; Tvede, Mich - 2020

We consider a connection networks model. Every agent has a demand in the form of pairs of locations she wants connected, and a willingness to pay for connectivity. A planner aims at implementing a welfare maximizing network and allocating the resulting cost, but information is asymmetric: agents...

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012242016

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Next
Last