Showing 1 - 10 of 14
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013553681
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012195417
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012102427
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015053633
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014451304
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012273837
This study shows that asymmetry among countries can develop a stability of international environmental agreements, using a repeated game model. Our model reveals relaxed conditions for a weakly renegotiation-proof (WRP) equilibrium by selecting the punishment levels according to the types of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014110669
Asheim et al. (2006, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol.51, pp.93-109) show that participation in international environmental agreements (IEAs) can be doubled in a two-region world by the Regional Penance strategy, designating countries that are permitted to punish...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012953330
This paper considers whether international environmental public goods provision bring significant benefits to countries with through a regional cooperation than a global cooperation. Using a repeated game model, this study shows that the regional cooperative approach is an appropriate way to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012917044
This research aims to relax the condition in which international environmental agreements consists of asymmetric countries are sustained for a long-term, considering a repeated game model and the effect of ancillary benefits. We suppose all countries have the feature of two-sided asymmetry: the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012907174