Showing 1 - 5 of 5
We study the role of the choice of a fundamental database on the portfolio returns of a set of 74 fundamental anomalies. We benchmark Compustat by comparing it to Datastream in the US and find systematic differences in the raw financial statements across the databases. These differences only...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012063460
We study out-of-sample returns on 153 anomalies in equities documented in academic literature. We show that machine learning techniques that aggregates all the anomalies into one mispricing signal are 4 times more profitable than a strategy based on individual anomalies and survive on a liquid...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012925936
We study the role of the choice of a fundamental database on the portfolio returns of a set of 74 fundamental anomalies. We benchmark Compustat by comparing it to Datastream in the US and find systematic differences in the raw financial statements across the databases. These differences only...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012923431
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013282494
We study the role of the choice of a fundamental database on the portfolio returns of a set of 74 fundamental anomalies. We benchmark Compustat by comparing it to Datastream in the US and find systematic differences in the raw financial statements across the databases. These differences only...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011879388