Showing 1 - 10 of 85
We develop new procedures to quantify the statistical uncertainty of data-driven clustering algorithms. In our panel setting, each unit belongs to one of a finite number of latent groups with group-specific regression curves. We propose methods for computing unit-wise and joint confidence sets...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012925956
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012607313
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012436115
Our confidence set quantifies the statistical uncertainty from data-driven group assignments in grouped panel models. It covers the true group memberships jointly for all units with pre-specified probability and is constructed by inverting many simultaneous unit-specific one-sided tests for...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015053064
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011304846
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011654470
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012208804
We provide an overidentification test for a nonparametric treatment model where individuals are allowed to select into treatment based on unobserved gains. Our test can be used to test the validity of instruments in a framework with essential heterogeneity (Imbens and Angrist 1994). The...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010396750
We provide an overidentification test for a nonparametric treatment model where individuals are allowed to select into treatment based on unobserved gains. Our test can be used to test the validity of instruments in a framework with essential heterogeneity (Imbens and Angrist 1994). The...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010491120
We provide an overidentification test for a nonparametric treatment model where individuals are allowed to select into treatment based on unobserved gains. Our test can be used to test the validity of instruments in a framework with essential heterogeneity (Imbens and Angrist 1994). The...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011163944