Showing 191 - 200 of 47,355
The English courts in Sainsbury's v. MasterCard and Morrisons v. MasterCard came to opposite conclusions on the illegality of MasterCard's multilateral interchange fees (MIFs). While both courts posited bilateral counterfactuals, the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) in Sainsbury's held that...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012853870
The Rule of Reason, which has come to dominate modern antitrust law, allows defendants the opportunity to justify their conduct by demonstrating “procompetitive” effects. Seizing the opportunity, defendants have begun offering increasingly numerous and creative explanations for their...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012853929
Sainsbury's v. MasterCard establishes the pass-on “defence” in English/UK law. The Competition Appeal Tribunal set out a two-part test which it erroneously distinguished from the economists' notion of pass-on. It then went on the develop key elements of legal test for pass-on in price fixing...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012854748
Antitrust law enforcement against vertical restraints has made great progress since the 1970s, building on the advances in economic thinking. Challenges to vertical mergers are rare and most vertical restraints are not prohibited without an analysis of their anticompetitive effects. Most...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013055413
I analyze cliff discounts when an incumbent monopolist faces competition from a competitor that can compete for a portion (but not all) of the market, and compare them with both simple pricing and pricing formulas in which the incumbent can cut prices just in the competitive portion of the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013025558
This paper evaluates the effect on competition of adopting the FTC's product hopping theory as an antitrust doctrine. The paper criticizes the theory and explains why it would be a mistake to adopt it as a guide to antitrust liability
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012986985
In Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois, the Supreme Court adopted a per se ban on private, treble damage antitrust suits by “indirect purchasers” in federal courts. The Court did so based on its belief that, if permitted, such actions could result in duplicative liability and protracted and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012990979
This paper analyses the role of the European Commission in taking cases of abuse of dominance in the telecommunications sector since its liberalisation in 1998. The argument is that the Commission has played a very active antitrust role, in particular at the beginning of the liberalisation, and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013046452
As technology and interconnectivity have continued to flourish, so too has an important and complex form of enterprise: the platform. Services like Uber, Google Search, Hulu, and American Express cater to distinct but deeply-interdependent “sides” of customers that derive value or revenues...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012927817
John Kwoka's Mergers, Merger Control, and Remedies is a meta-analysis of “retrospective” academic studies of consummated mergers and other horizontal arrangements. Based on this meta-analysis, Kwoka strongly criticizes federal enforcement policies, claiming that the agencies permit far too...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012930736