Showing 1 - 10 of 62,292
first investigate the extent to which collusive agreements are feasible. Secondly, we focus on collusion sustainability in …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011982484
In this paper we investigate the connection between cost asymmetries and the sustainability of collusion within the …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010905516
We discuss the implications of a Stackelberg sequence of play between a cartel and the fringe. We consider two different approaches to collusion: (i) one-stage static model and (ii) a multi-period oligopoly model. Our main result is that in the static model with quantity-setting firms a stable...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008564421
In this paper we investigate the connection between the number of competitors and the sustainability of collusion …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009195454
This paper shows how competing firms can facilitate tacit collusion by making passive investments in rivals. In general, the incentives of firms to collude depend in a complex way on the whole set of partial cross ownership (PCO) in the industry. We show that when firms are identical, only...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010263345
In their merger control, EU and the US have considered symmetric size distribution (cost structure) of firms to be a factor potentially leading to collusion. We show that forbidding mergers leading to symmetric market structures can induce mergers leading to asymmetric market structures with...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010320098
Many convicted cartels have a leader which is substantially larger than its rivals. In a setting where firms face indivisible costs of collusion, we show that: (i) firms may have an incentive to merge so as to create asymmetric market structures since this enables the merged firm to cover the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005792412
In their merger control, EU and the US have considered symmetric size distribution (cost structure) of firms to be a factor potentially leading to collusion. We show that forbidding mergers leading to symmetric market structures can induce mergers leading to asymmetric market structures with...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005069733
In their merger control, EU and the US have considered symmetric size distribution (cost structure) of firms to be a factor potentially leading to collusion. We show that forbidding mergers leading to symmetric market structures can induce mergers leading to asymmetric market structures with...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005645413
In their merger control, EU and the US have considered symmetric size distribution (cost structure) of firms to be a factor potentially leading to collusion. We show that forbidding mergers leading to symmetric market structures can induce mergers leading to asymmetric market structures with...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005115559