Showing 1 - 10 of 10
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012096931
We propose a new framework of collective decision-making, which takes conflicts of interest among the voters and voting alternatives (e.g., among committee members/referees and applicants/contestants for some competition) into account. We define accountability by properties of social welfare...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013245480
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012019501
We consider social decision-making situations where some voters may have a conflict of interest in some social alternatives/applicants to be ranked. Then the accountability of the collective decision process is essential. We extend the standard social welfare function to include the interest...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014358088
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012017481
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012607118
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012253618
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011326870
The aim of this paper is to characterize incomplete preferences with optimism and pessimism (IPOP) over Anscombe-Aumann acts, a class of preference orders that may fail axioms that require the decision-maker to think contingency. The main result axiomatizes preferences that compare any pair of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012827740
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013373425