Showing 1 - 10 of 1,018
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009594489
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009595142
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009595354
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009595768
Cancelling of poor-country debt does not mean that the best way to give aid is through grants only. Aid through loans may often prove superior, provided that it maintains debt sustainability. A new scheme for soft loans is suggested, with higher interest rates and cancellation provisions if bad...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005045400
Suppose a DAC donor earmarks $1 billion of taxpayers’ money for official development assistance (ODA). The donor may use two instruments as an outright grant or in combination with a market loan to produce a concessional loan of $2 billion with a percentage grant element of 50 per cent. Many...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10004962358
We argue in this paper that cancelling the debt of the poorest countries was a good thing, but that it should not imply that the debt instrument should be foregone. We claim that debt and debt cancellations are indeed two complementary instruments which, if properly managed, perform better than...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005656217
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005613622
This paper looks at the ?grants versus loans?? controversy. It questions the claim sometimes made that development institutions should refrain from making loans and should instead distribute ODA as outright grants only. It discusses various reasons why developing countries do not have full...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005560032
We argue in this paper that cancelling the debt of the poorest countries was a good thing, but that it should not imply that the debt instrument should be foregone. Debt and debt cancellations are indeed two complementary instruments which, if properly managed, perform better than either loans...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005031760