Showing 81 - 90 of 46,810
Parameter estimates of structural economic models are often difficult to interpret at the light of the underlying economic theory. Bayesian methods have become increasingly popular as a tool for conducting inference on structural models since priors offer a way to exert control over the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010464781
Indirect inference testing can be carried out with a variety of auxiliary models. Asymptotically these different models make no difference. However, the small sample properties can differ. We explore small sample power and estimation bias both with different variable combinations and descriptive...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011886113
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011489408
Indirect Inference has been found to have much greater power than the Likelihood Ratio in small samples for testing DSGE models. We look at asymptotic and large sample properties of these tests to understand why this might be the case. We find that the power of the LR test is undermined when...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011317842
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003926948
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009748700
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012610508
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012304119
This paper addresses the growing gulf between traditional macroeconometrics and the increasingly dominant preference among macroeconomists to use DSGE models and to estimate them using Bayesian estimation with strong priors but not to test them as they are likely to fail conventional statistical...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011688793
Macroeconomic researchers use a variety of estimators to parameterise their models empirically. One such is FIML; another is a form of indirect inference we term "informal" under which data features are "targeted" by the model -i.e. parameters are chosen so that model-simulated features...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014440828