Showing 1 - 10 of 327
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012093161
Shareholder voting on corporate acquisitions is controversial. In most countries acquisition decisions are delegated to boards and shareholder approval is discretionary, which makes existing empirical studies inconclusive. We study the U.K. setting where shareholder approval is imposed...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010387165
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010509446
Shareholders of U.S. corporations have lost billions of dollars in acquisitions they never approved. In the United Kingdom the listing rules give shareholders a binding say when targets are large relative to acquirers. A transatlantic comparison suggests that if U.S. shareholders had a say on...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013243113
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011619990
Previous studies of voting on acquisitions are inconclusive because shareholder approval in the United States is discretionary for management. We study the U.K. where approval is mandatory for deals that exceed a multivariate relative size threshold. We find that in the U.K. shareholders gain 8...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011207403
This article reports a unique analysis of private engagements by an activist fund. It is based on data made available to us by Hermes, the fund manager owned by the British Telecom Pension Scheme, on engagements with management in companies targeted by its UK Focus Fund. In contrast with most...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011427224
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003868547
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003959193
This article reports a unique analysis of private engagements by an activist fund. It is based on data made available to us by Hermes, the fund manager owned by the British Telecom Pension Scheme, on engagements with management in companies targeted by its UK Focus Fund. In contrast with most...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013151758