Showing 51 - 60 of 118
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015072288
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014636326
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013269938
Central banks sometimes evaluate their own policies. To assess the inherent conflict of interest, we compare the research findings of central bank researchers and academic economists regarding the macroeconomic effects of quantitative easing (QE). We find that central bank papers report larger...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012414816
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013342530
We compare the findings of central bank researchers and academic economists regarding the macroeconomic effects of quantitative easing (QE). We find that central bank papers find QE to be more effective than academic papers do. Central bank papers report larger effects of QE on output and in...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012605280
Fabo, Jancoková, Kempf, and Pástor (2021) show that papers written by central bank researchers find quantitative easing (QE) to be more effective than papers written by academics. Weale and Wieladek (2022) show that a subset of these results lose statistical significance when OLS regressions...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014282660
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011495843
Central banks sometimes evaluate their own policies. To assess the inherent conflict of interest, we compare the research findings of central bank researchers and academic economists regarding the macroeconomic effects of quantitative easing (QE). We find that central bank papers report larger...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012823107
Central banks sometimes evaluate their own policies. To assess the inherent conflict of interest, we compare the research findings of central bank researchers and academic economists regarding the macroeconomic effects of quantitative easing (QE). We find that central bank papers report larger...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012823128