Showing 61 - 70 of 161
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008933773
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003162046
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010207917
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009777185
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014279970
We utilize a laboratory experiment to compare effort provision under optimal tournament contracts with different distributions of prizes which motivate agents to compete to be first, avoid being last, or both. We find that the combined tournament contract incorporating both incentives at the top...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011345390
Managers often use tournament incentive schemes which motivate workers to compete for the top, compete to avoid the bottom, or both. In this paper we test the effectiveness and efficiency of these incentive schemes. To do so, we utilize optimal contracts in a principal-agent setting, using a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010329408
Contests are meant to attract the best performers and incentivize high effort, however, they may also attract cheaters who try to win via illicit means which crowds out the best performers. We use a laboratory experiment to explore the role of self-selection in contests with a possibility of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011622776
A debate among practicing managers is whether to use cooperative or competitive incentives for team production. While competitive incentives may drive individual effort higher, they may also lead to less help and more sabotage; an issue exacerbated when team members' abilities are varied. Using a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012873009
In winner-take-all tournaments, agents' performance is determined jointly by effort and luck, and the top performer is rewarded. We study the impact of the ''shape of luck'' -- the details of the distribution of performance shocks -- on incentives in such settings. We are concerned with the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013189045