Showing 21 - 30 of 33
The article argues that the BEPS project has made only minimal progress in its work on the transfer pricing for intangibles, despite the prominence of the issue. More specifically, it achieved none but increased confusion and incoherence in the context of the specific rules for CCAs
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012903536
The Article demonstrates, based on publicly available data and using a variety of indicators that the most salient initiatives to promote inclusivity within the international tax regime (Country-by-Country Reporting, the Multilateral Instrument, and the Inclusive Framework) have at best done...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013216470
This Article proceeds as follows: Part I reviews the traditional U.S. international tax policy, followed by Part II that highlights the impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Creation Act of 2017 on such policy. Part III provides context to the proposals made by this Article with a discussion of the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013217828
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009722040
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009521607
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003464065
This position paper of the IBFD Academic Task Force (hereinafter IBFD Task Force) relates to the OECD's work on BEPS Action 1 and is devoted to withholding tax aspects. This position paper provides possible solutions to the challenges presented to the international tax regime by the digital...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011334035
The United States’ cost sharing regime enables multinational enterprises to export United States intangible property to low or no tax jurisdictions, essentially tax-free. This is in stark contrast to long standing United States policy, and the explicit tax agenda of the Obama administration....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014192909
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012831417
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012439505