Showing 1 - 10 of 23
Economic value added (EVA) is the performance metric bound to be biased by design. The measurement bias comes from contrasting NOPAT, which is a purely operating profit, with the capital charge on the money investors have put into the firm, which is calculated by applying the after tax WACC...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013102010
Taking a slightly closer look at the EVA basics prompts that the metric by design is a synthetic mixture of returns from the operating and financing activities, and therefore, yields a biased assessment of both the operating and overall performance. Fundamentally, the scale of the measurement...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013084110
This article introduces a new financial metric for managerial performance evaluation, Value Added to Invested Capital (VAIC), with the cost of unlevered equity as a hurdle rate to calculate the capital charge rather than the widely accepted WACC. VAIC preserves all positive features of the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013091020
In this teaching note, we discuss the basic principles for tariff setting. Tariff setting is very important for regulated industries, such as water and power. The tariff should provide an appropriate risk-adjusted return to the investor. If the tariff were too low, then the investors would not...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012729479
Debt financing with subsidizes interest rate has a multidimensional impact on the firm. Value of the levered equity, value of the debt and overall firm value will be different of those values with debt financing at market rate. Subsidized interest rate on debt does not create any additional cash...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012731532
We argue that the Economic Value Added (EVA) is biased by design and will generally yield distorted assessment of both the operating and overall performance. Fundamentally, the scale of measurement bias depends on the interest tax shield actually obtained in a measurement period and on a book to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012905410
In this rejoinder, we note that the complaint against the classic FCF WACC is misplaced because it incorrectly identifies the real source of the problem. The fault for the discrepancies, dear colleagues, lies not in the classic formulation of the FCF WACC. The real reason for the discrepancies...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012890371
A common procedure for determining the cost of capital for capital investment decisions involves adjusting an unlevered beta for the risk of financial leverage. This note demonstrates that a widespread practice of levering the beta coefficients using the formula of Hamada implies a possibility...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012896981
Taking a slightly closer look at the EVA basics prompts that the metric by design is a synthetic mixture of returns from the operating and financing activities, and therefore, yields a biased assessment of both the operating and overall performance. Fundamentally, the scale of the measurement...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012936046
We demonstrate analytically and illustrate with examples that the conventional measures of the residual operating income such as the Economic Value Added (EVA) are biased by design and so may yield a misleading assessment of financial performance. Fundamentally, the magnitude of the measurement...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012865144