Showing 1 - 10 of 19,094
A bundled discount occurs when a seller conditions a discount or rebate on the buyer's purchaser or two or more different products. Firms that produce fewer than all the good in the bundle find it difficult to compete because they must amortize the discount across a smaller range of goods. For...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012749882
The Neal Report, which was commissioned by Lyndon Johnson and published in 1967, is rightfully criticized for representing the past rather than the future of antitrust. Its authors completely embraced a theory of competition and industrial organization that had dominated American economic...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012718956
Mergers involving dominant firms legitimately receive close scrutiny under the antitrust laws, even if they involve tiny firms. Further, they should be examined closely even in markets that generally exhibit low entry barriers. Many of the so-called quot;unilateral effectsquot; cases in current...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012719607
Antitrust and competition law have grown dramatically in importance and significance over the last fifty years. US antitrust law has been the principal source of inspiration for jurisdictions wishing to introduce regulation to control cartels and monopolization, and antitrust regulation has now...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012913418
This historical overview examines the relationship between antitrust policy and intellectual property in the United States since 1890. Over most of this history, judges imagined far greater conflicts between antitrust policy and intellectual property rights than actually existed, or else relied...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014213690
After two years of litigation, the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the 19 states suing Microsoft have proposed draconian remedies (Plaintiffs Proposed Final Judgment 2000, hereafter, PPFJ) to address the violations of the Sherman Act found by Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson (Conclusions of Law...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014148779
United States v. Terminal Railroad Association, the essential facilities doctrine has been applied to a wide variety of business contexts - from football stadiums to the New York Stock Exchange. However, courts have also declined to extend the doctrine to a wide variety of situations. Despite...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014071952
Since even before Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp., 467 U.S. 752 (1984), it has been thought that antitrust needs some "theory of the firm" to inform its application of a "single-entity" defense in Sherman Act section 1 litigation. Not only is that sense mistaken, it is emblematic of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013129286
In this paper, we will analyse further the issue of concurrence between competition and sector rules and the relation between parallel concepts within the two different legal frameworks. We will firstly examine Third Party Access in relation to essential facilities doctrine and refusal of access...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013134857
Two panel opinions of the Seventh Circuit reached opposite conclusions in two massive antitrust cases during the past year, even though they purported to apply the same, now-infamous Twombly-Iqbal pleading standard, and even though the complaints in the two cases were very similar and the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013118339