Showing 81 - 90 of 90,527
This paper examines the performance consequences of cutting discretionary expenditures and managing accruals to exceed analyst forecasts. We show that firms that just beat analyst forecasts with low quality earnings exhibit a short-term stock price benefit relative to firms that miss forecasts...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013157799
Financial reporting around the time of IPOs is consistent with listed firms reporting more conservatively than previously as private firms, consistent with the results in Ball and Shivakumar (2005). We hypothesize that IPO firms supply the higher quality financial reports demanded by public...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012721563
The likelihood that earnings announcements meet or beat analyst expectations differs substantially and systematically across firms. Prior research explores managers incentives to meet analyst expectations. In this paper, we examine analysts incentives to issue systematically biased earnings...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012724957
After a string of years in which security analysts' top stock picks significantly outperformed their pans, the year 2000 was a disaster. During that year the stocks least favorably recommended by analysts earned an annualized market-adjusted return of 48.66 percent while the stocks most highly...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012728213
The paper studies the manner by which earnings expectations are met, measures the rewards to meeting or beating earnings expectations (MBE) formed just prior to the release of quarterly earnings, and tests alternative explanations for this reward. The evidence supports the claims that the MBE...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012728260
Abstract: Using earnings restatement firms, this study takes a disaggregate approach to examine two issues related to earnings management: (1) are specific accruals related to specific types of earnings manipulations as admitted by the restatement firms; and (2) does management, concerned with...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012731500
We examine whether conflicts of interest with investment banking and brokerage induce sell-side analysts to issue optimistic stock recommendations and, if so, whether investors are misled by such biases. Using quantitative measures of potential conflicts constructed from revenue breakdowns of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012732173
This paper considers the information content of stock reports when an investment bank offers her affiliated analyst a compensation contract that may induce him to misrepresent his stock report under uncertainty in investment banking opportunities. Our results suggest that the information content...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012732287
We examine the impact of Regulation Fair Disclosure on the competitive advantage of All-Star analysts as measured by turnover in the rankings. Institutional Investor All-Americans, chosen by votes of institutional investors based on overall helpfulness, experienced a significant increase in...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012734784
This study offers evidence on the earnings forecast bias analysts use to please firm management and the associated benefits they obtain from issuing such biased forecasts in the years prior to Regulation Fair Disclosure. Analysts who issue initial optimistic earnings forecasts followed by...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012735472