Showing 11 - 20 of 278
This paper reviews the literature on idiosyncratic equity volatility since the publication of “Have Individual Stocks Become More Volatile? An Empirical Exploration of Idiosyncratic Risk” in 2001. We respond to replication studies by Chiah, Gharghori, and Zhong and by Leippold and Svaton,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013291964
This paper reviews the literature on idiosyncratic equity volatility since the publication of “Have Individual Stocks Become More Volatile? An Empirical Exploration of Idiosyncratic Risk” in 2001. We respond to replication studies by Chiah, Gharghori, and Zhong and by Leippold and Svaton,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013293400
This paper studies the behavior of idiosyncratic volatility for the post war period. Using aggregate idiosyncratic volatility statistics constructed from the Fama and French (1993) three-factor model, we find that the volatility of individual stocks appears to have increased over time. This...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012742112
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10007372666
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10006025798
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10006565906
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10006984828
This paper uses a disaggregated approach to study the volatility of common stocks at the market, industry, and firm levels. Over the period 1962-97 there has been a noticeable increase in firm-level volatility relative to market volatility. Accordingly correlations among individual stocks and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005714751
This article studies the behavior of idiosyncratic volatility for the postWorld War II period. Using aggregate idiosyncratic volatility statistics constructed from the Fama and French (1993) three-factor model, we find that the volatility of individual stocks appears to have increased over time....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005781656
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001981333