Showing 1 - 10 of 94
We examine six accounting-based stock price anomalies using two sets of tests to determine the extent to which the anomalies (a) represent market mispricing, or (b) reflect premia for unidentified risks. Market mispricing is indicated if the anomalous returns are concentrated around subsequent...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012753120
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001795368
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10006567106
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10006997829
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10007009666
This paper tests whether the US stock market is myopic, in the sense that it places less than the appropriate weight on expected long-run earnings. The tests are made possible through reliance on a valuation model used by Ohlson [1995] that permits us, using only minimal assumptions, to make...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012713759
Prior empirical research has typically found a difference between fourth-quarter and interim earnings, both in terms of the accuracy of earnings forecasts and the stock price response evoked. However, a differential stock price response to fourth-quarter earnings could be due to a variety of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012789483
We test whether the US stock market is myopic in the sense of overvaluing short term earnings and undervaluing long term earnings (see, e.g., Porter [1992;1993]. Our tests rely on an accounting-based valuation model that generates predictions about how prices should relate to expected future...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012755975
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001065707
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001083410