Auditors are routinely exposed to preliminary audit evidence that is subsequently found to be erroneous. In an experiment with auditors as participants, we show that subsequently invalidated evidence relating to a tender award to a client continues to influence auditors' interpretation of this...

Recent studies document that market participants react positively to the positive language sentiment or tone embedded in financial disclosures, and that investors' reactions to negative news are more muted with poor disclosure readability. However, while language sentiment and readability...

We investigate factors that influence an auditor's accuracy in knowing how their subordinates, peers, and superiors view his/her own technical competence (metaperception). Extant literature on reputation management in auditing contexts depicts preparers of audit workpapers as strategic agents...

This paper discusses judgment and decision making research in auditing - i.e., research that uses a psychological lens to understand, evaluate, and improve judgments, decisions, or choices in an auditing setting. Much of this work uses the laboratory experiment approach, but we will also cover...

Conference calls are a common way for firms to disseminate information to investors and analysts. We use controlled experiments to examine, in the context of the question and answer segment of conference calls, whether investors' investment judgments are jointly influenced by a CEO's use of...

We conduct an experiment to examine how repeated exposure to earnings notifications and notification checking mode affect investors' reactions to managers' strategic positive emphasis in the title of a disclosure when firm performance is mixed. We find that a title with (versus without) a...

In this study, we examine three factors that moderate the relation between accountability to a superior and auditor performance: knowledge, problem-solving ability, and task complexity. Specifically, we predict that accountability works best when the requisite knowledge and abilities are matched...

Disclosure standards mandate the quantitative disclosure of hedging-instrument related risks but not the disclosure of hedged item related risks. We examine how a match (mismatch) in formats, caused by making quantitative (qualitative) hedged item disclosures alongside quantitative hedging...

Recent research finds that investors' assessments of a stock's fundamental value are influenced by CSR performance through the affect-as-information heuristic (Elliott et al. 2014). We extend prior research by examining two boundary conditions for the use of this heuristic: (1) whether the CSR...

Using detailed data for fieldwork hours and audit hours by rank from audit engagements in Korea, we examine whether audits conducted under workload imbalance, proxied by busy-season audits, impair audit quality, and how auditors adjust staff assignments for busy-season audits. We generally find...