Showing 21 - 30 of 172
The private exchange of prices by competitors has long been a source of anticompetitive concern. Based on claims of possible procompetitive effects, the Supreme Court decided that antitrust challenges to these exchanges should be evaluated under the rule of reason. In reviewing the jurisprudence...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014239374
Antitrust law and patent law assume that an invalid patent cannot distort competition unless the patentee enforces the patent by initiating infringement litigation or explicitly threatening to do so. The Article argues that invalid patents can destroy competition - even without such enforcement...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014053780
This paper reviews, and proposes revisions to, the government's Corporate Leniency Policy, which confers leniency upon the first member of a price-fixing cartel to expose the illegal activity to the DOJ's Antitrust Division. Three important limitations apply. First, the ringleader of the cartel...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014056464
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013061898
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010340495
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009488735
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009548756
How can we allow patent examiners to effectively distinguish between patentable and unpatentable inventions, without slowing the process to a crawl or wasting a bunch of money? This essay reviews the recent literature and considers a number of proposals and their limitations. It concludes that...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012460578
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009948269
In this paper, we show that there are important differences across patent examiners at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. We show that more experienced examiners cite less prior art, are more likely to grant patents, and are more likely to grant patents without any rejections. These results...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011009918