Showing 1 - 10 of 799
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003749158
Empirically, co-skewness of asset returns seems to explain a substantial part of the cross-sectional variation of mean return not explained by beta. This finding is typically interpreted in terms of a risk averse representative investor with a cubic utility function. This paper questions this...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005213462
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008057713
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008663204
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009660448
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002627424
This study analyzes various measures of the downside beta of stocks. Downside beta is sometimes defined and estimated in different ways. Theoretically, an approach based on the mean-semi-variance equilibrium model appears superior. Two known alternative approaches are not consistent with the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013112836
This study compares the single-factor CAPM with the Fama and French three-factor model and the Carhart four-factor model using a broad cross-section and long time-series of US stock portfolios and controlling for market capitalization. Confirming known results, multiple factors help for value...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012737300
The mean-semivariance CAPM better explains the cross-section of US stock returns than the traditional mean-variance CAPM does. If regular beta is replaced by downside beta, the cross-sectional risk-return relationship improves considerably. Especially during bad-states of the world, when the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012737350
This study conducts a classroom experiment and an online experiment to examine individual decision-making under risk. Like Levy and Levy (2002), the experiment uses pairs of mixed gambles with moderate probabilities to avoid the framing effect and certainty affect that may affect non-mixed...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012778758