Showing 91 - 100 of 621
Prior literature on accounting journal rankings has provided different journal lists depending on the type of examination (citations- vs. survey-based) and the choice of journals covered. A recent study by Bonner, Hesford, Van der Stede, and Young (2006) [Bonner, S., Hesford, A., Van der Stede,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005022824
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to assess the quality of doctoral programs in terms of their faculty auditing research output as well as their effectiveness in training future auditing faculty. Design/methodology/approach –This paper presents a retrospective analysis of auditing...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010814582
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008896698
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008900641
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008301766
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010508169
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012607590
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to provide a complementary analysis of finance journals that are often being overlooked in prior studies. Specifically, the authors examine the Australian Business Dean Council’s (ABDC’s) C-ranked journals in terms of their authors’ affiliations...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014941342
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to provide a selective review of literature and presents a conceptual framework in journal and institution rankings. Several streams of ranking literature are analyzed. Design/methodology/approach – The authors provide a conceptual framework to analyze...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014941747
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012189705