Showing 21 - 30 of 46
We examine the effect of relative performance contracts on a manager’s economic incentives to manipulate earnings. Using data on actual peer firms, we find that higher earnings manipulation in the set of peer firms leads to higher earnings manipulation in the target firm. If the peer firm also...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013406575
Employing a plausibly exogenous shock that increased the extent to which private information is revealed in debt markets – the implementation of the Trade Reporting and Compliance Engine (TRACE) - we document a change in long-run management earnings forecast policy. We find that managers...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014257946
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012094567
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011544044
The paper shows that controlling for the aggregate volatility risk factor eliminates the puzzling negative relation between variability of trading activity and future abnormal returns. I also find that variability of other measures of liquidity and liquidity risk is largely unrelated to expected...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013038610
The paper shows that issuing activity does not result in superior liquidity. Even the kinds of new issues that are supposed to be more liquid than others (IPOs backed by venture capital, new issues with high-prestige underwriters, severely underpriced IPOs) are just as liquid as their peer...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012904032
The paper shows that lottery-like stocks are hedges against unexpected increases in market volatility. The loading on the aggregate volatility risk factor explains low returns to stocks with high maximum returns in the past (Bali, Cakici, and Whitelaw, 2011) and high expected skewness (Boyer,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012940125
The paper shows that the difference in aggregate volatility risk can explain why several anomalies are stronger among the stocks with low institutional ownership (IO). Institutions tend to stay away from the stocks with extremely low and extremely high levels of firm-specific uncertainty because...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012976769
The paper discovers that firm complexity is negatively priced in cross-section. High/low-complexity conglomerates have 35-50/20-28 bp per month more negative five-factor Fama and French (2015) alphas than single-segment firms, and this effect is stronger in subsamples with low institutional...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012852638
Firms with lower profitability have lower expected returns because such firms perform better than expected when market volatility increases. The better-than-expected performance arises because unprofitable firms are distressed and volatile, their equity resembles a call option on the assets, and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012855868