Showing 1 - 10 of 210
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012094225
Using a sample of 97 stock return anomalies, we find that anomaly returns are 50% higher on corporate news days and are 6 times higher on earnings announcement days. These results could be explained by dynamic risk, mispricing via biased expectations, and data mining. We develop and conduct...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012971410
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012237549
Firm-level variables that predict cross-sectional stock returns, such as price-to-earnings and short interest, are often averaged and used to predict the time series of market returns. We extend this literature and limit the data-snooping bias by using a large population of the literature's...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012847603
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014309475
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003891520
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010370780
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011561869
Previous studies link equity market liberalization to economic growth in emerging markets. In the 24 emerging markets that we study, liberalizations always coincide with other economic reforms, making identification difficult. Theories linking liberalization to growth predict that at the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012974227
We study the out-of-sample and post-publication return-predictability of 97 variables that academic studies show to predict cross-sectional stock returns. Portfolio returns are 26% lower out-of-sample and 58% lower post-publication. The out-of-sample decline is an upper bound estimate of data...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013007906