Showing 51 - 60 of 311
In the last several years, India has raised several novel and controversial concerns regarding standard-essential patents (SEPs). For example, in 2013 and 2014, the Competition Commission of India (CCI) issued investigation orders against Ericsson, alleging that the company violated its...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012968512
This comment is submitted to Korea's Fair Trade Commission ("KFTC") by the Global Antitrust Institute (GAI) at George Mason University School of Law in response to the KFTC's December 16, 2015 amendments to its Review Guidelines on Unfair Exercise of Intellectual Property Rights. The GAI...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013002287
This comment is submitted in response to the European Commission's (EC's) public consultation on the Regulatory Environment for Platforms, Online Intermediaries, Data, Cloud Computing, and the Collaborative Economy.The comment addresses: (1) concerns that the EC's survey methodology and design...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013002393
In the last year, we have seen a growing — and troubling — trend as courts and competition agencies around the globe propose and impose antitrust sanctions on holders of standard-essential patents (“SEPs”) for seeking injunctive relief against alleged infringers and for reneging on their...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013013677
This comment is submitted to Korea's Fair Trade Commission ("KFTC") by the Global Antitrust Institute (GAI) at George Mason University School of Law in response to the KFTC's December 17, 2014 revisions to its Review Guidelines on Unfair Exercise of Intellectual Property Rights. The GAI...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013014329
This comment is submitted in response to the Japan Fair Trade Commission's (JFTC's) request for public comments on the Draft Partial Amendment to the Guidelines for the Use of Intellectual Property under the Antimonopoly Act (Draft Amendment). The Draft Amendment specifies that seeking...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013016119
PAEs have been much in the news because of certain practices that imply their demand for royalties is nothing more than extortion based upon the nuisance value of a lawsuit the PAE might bring, or explicitly threatens to bring, if no agreement is reached with the party practicing the patent. The...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013025177
This comment is submitted in response to the Japan Fair Trade Commission's request for comments on its Summary of Issues Concerning the Modality of the Administrative Surcharge System. The Global Antitrust Institute's Competition Advocacy Program provides a wide-range of recommendations to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012985630
In a series of five merger cases from 1962 through 1974, the Supreme Court turned the then-reigning Structure-Conduct-Performance paradigm into the law of the land. The Court has not passed upon the substantive aspect of merger analysis since then. Thus, the legacy of these cases, in particular,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012985826
This comment is submitted in response to the National Development and Reform Commission of the People's Republic of China's public consultation on the Proposed Revisions to the Guidelines of the Anti-Monopoly Commission of the State Council on Determining the Illegal Gains Generated from...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012987196