Showing 71 - 80 of 79,213
We investigate if CEO power influences a firm's decision to change its compensation system in response to regulatory and public pressure. In particular, we assess if CEO power influences the choice of performance measures as a form of camouflage to minimize the impact of these reforms on their...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013032118
This paper examines the SEC regulation requiring non-binding general shareholder vote on executive compensation–“say-on-pay” (SOP). We examine the first two years of SOP in the Russell 3000. The results confirm previous shareholder-proposal studies by finding that SOP approval (reject)...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013036020
We argue gender-diverse boards are associated with distinct preferences that reassure investors about their commitment to moderate risk and boost long-term corporate survival. Results suggest a strong relation between gender-diverse boards and bondholder-aligned CEO compensation components,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012849311
result of powerful managers setting their own pay. Others interpret high pay as the result of optimal contracting in a …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013145369
Executive pay clawback provisions require executives to repay previously received compensation under certain circumstances, such as a downward adjustment to the financial results upon which their incentive pay was predicated. The use of these provisions is on the rise, and the SEC is expected to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013243006
suggest that managers can routinely manipulate performance metrics in order to increase their performance-based compensation …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012832494
facilitate managerial opportunism is scarce. In this paper, we examine whether managers opportunistically exploit heightened … attention around the conference to “hype” the stock. We find that managers increase the quantity of voluntary disclosure leading … with some managers hyping the stock prior to the conference …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013312918
Panel OLS and GMM-IV estimates indicate that executives respond to the adoption of a compensation clawback provision by decreasing firm risk. The mechanisms that transmit incentives to decisions and decisions to risk appear to be more conservative investment and financial policies and preemptive...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012107693
The litmus test for an effective compensation program is whether it provides “pay for performance.” While the concept of pay for performance is simple, its implementation is not. In particular, boards must consider not only whether a compensation plan encourages executives to pursue...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011864729
If overstatements were a symptom of the agency conflict, pay-for-performance sensitivities should have increased in response to the additional penalties for misreporting imposed by SOX. Our finding of their decrease is inconsistent with the view that overstatements were an unintended consequence...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014204131