Showing 11 - 20 of 535
Quantal response equilibrium (QRE) of McKelvey and Palfrey (1995) relaxes the rationality requirement of Nash equilibrium by allowing for probabilistic mistakes or “noise in actions” while maintaining that beliefs are correct. QRE is well-studied, and much is known about the falsifiable...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012852990
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012888223
Mechanism design teaches us that a mediator can strictly improve the chances of peace between two opponents even when the mediator has no independent resources, is less informed than the two parties, and has no enforcement power. We test the theory in a lab experiment where two subjects...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012482356
We conduct an experiment in which we elicit subjects’ beliefs over opponents’ behavior multiple times for a given game without feedback. We find that the large majority of individual subjects have stochastic belief reports, which we argue cannot be explained by learning or measurement error....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014078590
We study an axiomatic variant of quantal response equilibrium (QRE) for normal form games that augments the regularity axioms (Goeree et al., 2005) with various forms of “symmetry” across players and actions. The model refines regular QRE, generalizes logit QRE, and is tractable in many...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014078591
Mechanism design teaches us that a mediator can strictly improve the chances of peace between two opponents even when the mediator has no independent resources, is less informed than the two parties, and has no enforcement power. We test the theory in a lab experiment where two subjects...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014090443
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012383768
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012029655
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014226743
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012635996