Showing 1 - 10 of 189
We search for impartiality in the allocation of objects when monetary transfers are not possible. Our main focus is anonymity. The standard definition requires that if agents' names are permuted, their assignments should be permuted in the same way. Since no rule satisfies this definition in...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010487558
We search for impartiality in the allocation of objects when monetary transfers are not possible. Our main focus is anonymity. The standard definition requires that if agents' names are permuted, their assignments should be permuted in the same way. Since no rule satisfies this definition in...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011421502
We search for impartiality in the allocation of objects when monetary transfers are not possible. Our main focus is anonymity. The standard definition requires that if agents' names are permuted, their assignments should be permuted in the same way. Since no rule satisfies this definition in...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011194281
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012211945
We consider situations where a society allocates a finite units of an indivisible good among agents, and each agent receives at most one unit of the good. For example, imagine that a government allocates a fixed number of licences to private firms, or imagine that a government distributes...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003321348
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003347871
“Strategy-proofness” is one of the axioms that are most frequently used in the recent literature on social choice theory. It requires that by misrepresenting his preferences, no agent can manipulate the outcome of the social choice rule in his favor. The stronger requirement of “group...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002718475
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001721392
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001192432
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001200273