Showing 1 - 10 of 219
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011446602
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009554307
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009554315
Lin and Chang (2009, 2010) establish a VIX futures and option pricing theory when modeling S&P 500 index by using a stochastic volatility process with asset return and volatility jumps. In this note, we prove that Lin and Chang's formula is not an exact solution of their pricing equation. More...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009554553
[16] and [17] establish a VIX futures and option pricing theory when modeling S&P 500 index by using a stochastic volatility process with asset return and volatility jumps. In this note, we prove that Lin and Chang's formula is not an exact solution of their pricing equation. More generally, we...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013099972
It is common in the financial mathematics literature to start by fixing a probability space $(\Omega,\mathcal F,\mathbb P)$, on which the underlying price process is defined. We depart from this route in that we do not fix the prior $\mathbb P$. Under very general assumptions, we recover the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013082678
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009840987
Lin and Chang (2009, 2010) establish a VIX futures and option pricing theory when modeling S&P 500 index by using a stochastic volatility process with asset return and volatility jumps. In this note, we prove that Lin and Chang’s formula is not an exact solution of their pricing equation. More...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010680443
Lin and Chang (2009, 2010) establish a VIX futures and option pricing theory when modeling S&P 500 index by using a stochastic volatility process with asset return and volatility jumps. In this note, we prove that Lin and Chang's formula is not an exact solution of their pricing equation. More...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010577448
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014232836