Showing 51 - 60 of 165,982
We study the relations between governance mechanisms (internal and external), conference call voluntary disclosures (incidence and length), and CEO compensation using hand-collected data on conference calls, corporate governance, and compensation. We hypothesize and show that institutions push...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012974636
In the wake of the backdating scandal, many firms began awarding options at scheduled times each year. Scheduling option grants eliminates backdating, but creates other agency problems. CEOs that know the dates of upcoming scheduled option grants have an incentive to temporarily depress stock...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013006948
Using the pay restriction imposed on CEOs of centrally administered state-owned enterprises (CSOEs) in China in 2009, we study the effects of limiting CEO pay. Compared with CEOs of firms not subject to the restriction, the CEOs of CSOEs experienced a significant pay cut. In response to the pay...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012853325
This study examines the relation between the magnitude of an institution's stock ownership and its tendency to support management through the “Say-On-Pay” (SOP) executive compensation vote. We find that an institutional investor is more likely to oppose management on the SOP vote for...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012856495
This paper investigates the role external advice plays in the board's determination of CEO compensation. We show that CEO incentive pay increases with the degree of compensation consultant independence using a quasi-natural experiment provided by the creation of an independent consultant after...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012861088
We explore the effect of co-opted directors on CEO power. Co-opted directors are those appointed after the incumbent CEO assumes office and are found by prior research to represent a weakened governance mechanism. Our evidence reveals that co-opted directors lead to less powerful CEOs,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012991913
According to the prior literature, family executives of family-controlled firms receive lower compensation than non-family executives. One of the key driving forces behind this is the existence of family members who are not involved in management, but own significant fraction of shares and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013047067
This study examines how the equity compensation of chief executive officers (CEO) and that of outside directors affect management earnings forecasts (MFs) and the relationship between these two positions in terms of compensation. Our evidence reveals that CEO (director) equity compensation is...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012920195
This paper studies the impact of corporate governance mechanisms on managerial compensation horizon under common ownership. We find that the predominant governance approach under common ownership is the threat of exit, which inadvertently exacerbates managerial myopia. Hence, common owners tend...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013216166
Executive equity compensation is granted out of an equity incentive plan that must be approved by shareholders. Equity incentive plans are an important precursor to equity grants because plan terms give boards of directors discretion over the amount and features of equity that can be granted...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013216623