Showing 1 - 10 of 672
Using hundreds of significant anomalies as testing portfolios, this paper compares the performance of major empirical asset pricing models. The q-factor model and a closely related five-factor model are the two best performing models among a long array of models. The q-factor model outperforms...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011279578
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011337567
Motivated from investment-based asset pricing, we propose a new factor model that consists of the market factor, a size factor, an investment factor, and a return-on-equity factor. The new model [i] outperforms the Carhart (1997) four-factor model in pricing portfolios formed on earnings...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009697761
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009665928
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010442479
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012244729
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011701512
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011664806
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012061882
The anomalies literature is infested with widespread p-hacking. We replicate this literature by compiling a large data library with 447 anomalies. With microcaps alleviated via NYSE breakpoints and value-weighted returns, 286 anomalies (64%) including 95 out of 102 liquidity variables (93%) are...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011963348