Showing 51 - 60 of 469
We use a unique dataset on individual retirement decisions in Swiss pension funds to analyze the choice between an annuity and a lump sum at retirement. Our analysis suggests the existence of an acquiescence biasʺ, meaning that a majority of retirees chooses the standard option offered by the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003297508
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003242843
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003187878
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002841975
If individuals are unable or unwilling to borrow, a higher than desired second pillar pension capital may induce people to retire earlier than they would have in the absence of such a scheme. Individuals thus leave the workforce as soon as the retirement income is deemed sufficient and the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002757821
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001655957
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001748267
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001582625
This paper provides new evidence on individual preferences over annuities and lump sum payments based on hypothetical questions posed in the DNB Household Survey in 2005. Contrary to the majority of papers in the annuitization puzzle literature, this study allows to control explicitly for the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013118962
This paper presents empirical evidence from the Netherlands indicating that the current policy based on information is unlikely to help people make the pension choices required in a system in which employees are the ultimate bearers of asset market risk. This holds even if information is made...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013096736