Showing 1 - 10 of 316
One of the most well known models of non‐expected utility is Gul's (1991) model of disappointment aversion. This model, however, is defined implicitly, as the solution to a functional equation; its explicit utility representation is unknown, which may limit its applicability. We show that an...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012637413
Many violations of the Independence axiom of Expected Utility can be traced to subjects' attraction to risk-free prospects. Negative Certainty Independence, the key axiom in this paper, formalizes this tendency. Our main result is a utility representation of all preferences over monetary...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010822868
Many violations of the Independence axiom of Expected Utility can be traced to subjects' attraction to risk-free prospects. Negative Certainty Independence, the key axiom in this paper, formalizes this tendency. Our main result is a utility representation of all preferences over monetary...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010900778
Many violations of the Independence axiom of Expected Utility can be traced to subjects' attraction to risk-free prospects. The key axiom in this paper, Negative Certainty Independence (Dillenberger, 2010), formalizes this tendency. Our main result is a utility representation of all preferences...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010743117
One of the most well-known models of non-expected utility is Gul (1991)'smodel of Disappointment Aversion. This model, however, is defined implicitly,as the solution to a functional equation; its explicit utility representation is unknown,which may limit its applicability. We show that an...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012910916
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010388232
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010390430
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011350625
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012000975
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011814074