Showing 1 - 10 of 759,320
The upper tail of the firm size distribution is often assumed to follows a Power Law behavior. Recently, using different estimators and on different data sets, several papers conclude that this distribution follows the Zipf Law, that is that the fraction of firms whose size is above a given...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009766302
Analyzing a comprehensive database of limited liability manufacturing firms this paper investigates the relation between a firm’s financial situation and its conditional expected growth rate. Specifically, using quantile regressions, we obtain a quantitative characterization of this relation...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009760791
The distribution of firm sizes is known to be heavy tailed. In order to account for this stylized fact, previous studies have focused mainly on growth through investments in a company's own operations (internal growth). Thereby, the impact of mergers and acquisitions (M&A) on the firm size...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011518770
encompasses the multivariate lognormal, to analyze the estimation of the joint distribution of the value of the firm's assets and …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012964673
Zipf's law is a well-known empirical regularity of firm size distribution. To date, it remains a puzzle as to what is the identity of the firms that causes this regularity. We document the multi-plant firm origin of Zipf's law - plants of multi-plant fi rms (exponent close to one) are more...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014030725
The upper tail of the firm size distribution is often assumed to follows a Power Law behavior. Recently, using different estimators and on different data sets, several papers conclude that this distribution follows the Zipf Law, that is that the fraction of firms whose size is above a given...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010328372
In this work it is investigated the survival bias of the firms' size distribution when we select a cohort (balanced panel) of firms following a Kesten type multiplicative process. It is shown that the bias is important, producing more symmetric size''s distributions
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013131996
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010255581
This paper examines a homogeneous-good Bertrand-Edgeworth oligopoly model to explore the role of firm size and number in pricing. We consider the price impact of merger, break up, investment, divestment, entry and exit. A merger leads to higher prices only when it increases the size of the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014420154
Economies have markedly different firm size distributions. At the same time, firms of different size grow differently after identical financial- and product-market liberalization reforms. Thus, identical reforms can produce different growth outcomes across countries. This result is reached after...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013082730