Showing 1 - 10 of 378
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012322378
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011596056
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011812495
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011711236
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014528107
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012192027
We provide a new theory to explain why firms multitask workers rather than specializing them. Workers over-perform in tasks they like and under-perform in tasks they dislike, to favorably influence future job assignments. Anticipating this, firms may find it optimal to commit to future...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013065625
We investigate how the decision of workers to join a specific type of firm affects their future career opportunities. Workers can either join a very competitive firm (big pond) or a less competitive one (small pond). In a big pond, it is more difficult to advance, but the potential rewards are...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012850538
Talented, ambitious workers (big fish) often join highly competitive organizations (big ponds), though they sometimes instead choose less competitive organizations (small ponds) offering brighter promotion prospects. Big fish exist in both types of organizations, though average worker ability is...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012850543
In a multi-task, market-based promotion tournament model, under different environments concerning employer learning about worker ability, it is shown that:i) Asymmetric learning in multi-task jobs is a necessary condition for "strategic shirking" (i.e., underperforming on certain tasks to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012934722