Showing 11 - 20 of 140
In a preemption game, players decide when to take an irreversible action. Delaying the action exogenously increases payoffs, but there is an early mover advantage. Riordan (1992) shows that in a preemption game with two asymmetric players, players act in decreasing order of efficiency. This...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011065418
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003595682
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003761361
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001738256
This paper analyzes pricing decisions and competition in network markets, assuming that groups of consumers can coordinate their choices when it is in their interest, if coordination does not require communication. It is shown that multiple asymmetric networks can coexist in equilibrium. A...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010494335
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003823926
This paper analyzes pricing decisions and competition in network markets, assuming that groups of consumers can coordinate their choices when it is in their interest, if coordination does not require communication. It is shown that multiple asymmetric networks can coexist in equilibrium. A...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003441183
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009689344
This paper assumes that groups of consumers in network markets can coordinate their choices when it is in their best interest to do so, and when coordination does not require communication. It is shown that multiple asymmetric networks can coexist in equilibrium if consumers have heterogeneous...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010261070
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003350008