Showing 1 - 10 of 328
New residents of rural communities are often assumed to have preferences for development and conservation that differ from those of longer-term residents. However, the literature offers little to quantify presumed preference heterogeneity. This article assesses whether stated preferences differ...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005202190
New residents of rural communities are often assumed to have preferences for development and conservation that differ from those of longer-term residents. However, the literature offers little to quantify presumed preference heterogeneity. This article assesses whether stated preferences differ...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009392505
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010423282
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001741461
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012881284
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10006113590
Newer residents of rural, urban-fringe communities are often assumed to have preferences for the development and conservation of rural lands that differ from those of longer-term residents. The existing literature offers little to verify or quantify presumed preference shifts. This paper...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005460339
This paper reports on a contingent choice study in which residents of a rural Rhode Island community were asked to express their preferences for packages of growth management outcomes, where surveys presented both spatial and non-spatial attributes of growth management outcomes. Survey results...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005468514
The rural public may not only be concerned with the consequences of land management; residents may also have systematic preferences for policy instruments applied to management goals. Preferences for outcomes do not necessarily imply matching support for the underlying policy process. This study...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005468769
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003975534