Showing 21 - 30 of 65
Recent literature has shown that lying behavior in the laboratory can well be explained by a combination of lying costs and reputation concerns. We extend the literature on lying behavior to strategic interactions. As reciprocal behavior is important in many interactions, we study a theoretical...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012892217
In the last decade, forced ranking systems where employees' bonuses depend on their rank assigned by superiors have become less popular. Whereas the inherently competitive structure of ranking systems provides high effort incentives, it might also increase incentives for misconduct. Previous...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013288029
We investigate the impact of consumer myopia on competition and firm behavior. In our model, firms repeatedly sell a primary good and a respective add-on. We study the impact of consumer myopia in the add-on market on pricing and on the ability of firms to engage in collusion. We show that in a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013078137
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012239093
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012224710
We study gender differences in relation to performance and sabotage in competitions. While we find no systematic gender differences in performance in the real effort task, we observe a strong gender gap in sabotage choices in our experiment. This gap is rooted in the uncertainty about the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011926075
Recent literature has shown that lying behavior in the laboratory can well be explained by a combination of lying costs and reputation concerns. We extend the literature on lying behavior to strategic interactions. As reciprocal behavior is important in many interactions, we study a theoretical...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011933920
We study the differences in behavior of males and females in a two-player tournament with sabotage in a controlled lab experiment. Implementing a real-effort design and a principal who is paid based on the agent s output, we find that males and females do not differ in their achievements in the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010958084
We study the differences in behavior of males and females in a two-player tournament with sabotage in a controlled lab experiment. Implementing a real-effort design and a principal who is paid based on the agent's output, we find that males and females do not differ in their performance in the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010753270
In the last decade, forced ranking systems where employees’ bonuses depend on their rank assigned by superiors have become less popular. Whereas the inherently competitive structure of ranking systems provides high effort incentives, it might also increase incentives for misconduct. Previous...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014079649