Showing 61 - 70 of 258
Behavioral economics provides several motivations for the common observation that agents appear somewhat unwilling to deviate from recent choices: salience, inertia, the formation of habits, the use of rules of thumb, or the locking in on certain modes of behavior due to learning by doing. This...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002640702
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002223821
Norde et al. [Games Econ. Behav. 12 (1996) 219] proved that none of the equilibrium concepts in the literature on equilibrium selection in finite strategic games satisfying existence is consistent. A transition to set-valued solution concepts overcomes the inconsistency problem: there is a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002622655
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003797643
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003686538
This paper constructs a type space that contains all types with a finite depth of reasoning, as well as all types with an infinite depth of reasoning - in particular those types for whom finite-depth types are conceivable, or think that finite-depth types are conceivable in the mind of other...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009581482
In an important paper, Weinstein and Yildiz (2007) show that if players have an infinite depth of reasoning and this is commonly believed, types generically have a unique rationalizable action in games that satisfy a richness condition. We show that this result does not extend to environments...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010221860
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009678295
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009273248
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003660196