Showing 91 - 100 of 17,368
In FTC v. Actavis, the Supreme Court held that settlements by which brand drug firms pay generics to delay entering the market could violate antitrust law. In the period since the decision, the lower courts have made clear that “payment” extends beyond cash to encompass non-cash forms of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012943542
Brand firms have delayed generic competition even when there are no (or weak) patents. This testimony to the FTC highlights 6 such behaviors: (1) pay-for-delay settlements, (2) product hopping, (3) citizen petitions, (4) "REMS" restrictions, (5) non-REMS distribution restrictions, and (6)...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012944060
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012969791
As CEO of Turing Pharmaceuticals, Martin Shkreli made worldwide headlines by obtaining marketing rights to pyrimethamine (Daraprim) and quickly increasing the price 5000 percent, from $13.50 to $750 per pill. In addition to increasing price, Turing initiated another less widely appreciated move...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012970155
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012970248
Drug prices are in the news. “Pharma Bro” Martin Shkreli increased the price of Daraprim, a treatment for fatal parasitic infections, by 5000%. Mylan found itself on the hot seat for raising the price of the anaphylaxis-treating EpiPen 15 times in 7 years, resulting in a 400% increase to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012978113
FTC v. Actavis was a landmark antitrust decision. In rejecting the “scope of the patent” test that had immunized settlements by which brand-name drug firms pay generic companies to delay entering the market (“exclusion payment settlements”), the Supreme Court made clear that such...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013003507
A lot changed between 2008 and 2015. Lindsay McSweeney's stewardship cemented the importance of CPI Antitrust Chronicle. Standard-essential patents, the smartphone patent wars, and patent trolls thrust themselves onto the IP/antitrust scene. But perhaps the most significant change is the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013010245
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012849905
In FTC v. Actavis, the Supreme Court held that a brand payment to a generic to delay entering the market could have "significant anticompetitive effects" and violate the antitrust laws. In a narrow, formalistic ruling, the court in In re Lamictal held that such payments were limited to cash. On...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013054789