Showing 1 - 6 of 6
One purpose of the individual mandate is to eliminate the market for self-insured healthcare transactions. It is well-established in this Court's precedent that the elimination of an interstate commercial market is a constitutionally legitimate end for Congress to pursue under the Commerce...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013105888
There was an argument that the Obama Administration's lawyers could have made — but didn't — in defending Obamacare's individual mandate against constitutional attack. That argument would have highlighted the role of comprehensive health insurance in steering individuals' health care savings...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013090343
The minimum coverage provision does not require individuals to purchase any unique product or service but rather requires a standardized financial contribution to the national healthcare infrastructure from all legal residents who are able to pay – a kind of requirement that has never been...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013066042
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011585048
This Symposium contribution argues that the national government ought to be in charge of most if not all healthcare regulation in the United States and that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act missed many opportunities to centralize regulatory authority in beneficial ways, leaving too...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014174218
On June 28, 2012, a mere century after the first presidential proposal for national health insurance, the Supreme Court issued a resounding victory for President Obama and for health-care reform generally, upholding the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act against a serious constitutional...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014167783