Showing 131 - 140 of 149
We find that the 52-week high effect (George and Hwang, 2004) cannot be explained by standard risk factors. Instead, it is more consistent with investor underreaction caused by anchoring bias: the presumably more sophisticated institutional investors suffer less from this bias and buy (sell)...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011263625
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011800912
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10006691023
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008768521
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008382233
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009843641
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008992452
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008992548
Whether higher idiosyncratic return volatility means more or less informative stock prices is an ongoing debate. All the existing literature relies on cross-sectional evidence, which makes it hard to isolate the effects of price informativeness on idiosyncratic volatility from other effects. I...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013112351
In the absence of market imperfections, the mutuality principle leads to efficient risk sharing and the Pareto optimal asset allocations. With market imperfections such as transaction costs and information asymmetry, risk-sharing becomes costly, and it can even lead to financial crises. We...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014107250