Narrow search
Showing 91 - 100 of 649,826
Cover Image
Parity dependence of a majority rule characterization on the condorcet domain
Merrill, Lauren Nicole - In: Economics letters 112 (2011) 3, pp. 259-261
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009297466
Cover Image
Unequivocal majority and Maskin-monotonicity
Amorós, Pablo - 2008
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003826133
Cover Image
Anonymous, neutral, and strategy-proof rules on the Condorcet domain
Campbell, Donald E.; Kelly, Jerry S. - In: Economics letters 128 (2015), pp. 79-82
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011383021
Cover Image
Weak Condorcet winner(s) revisited
Felsenthal, Dan S.; Tideman, T. Nicolaus - In: Public choice 160 (2014) 3/4, pp. 313-326
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010388671
Cover Image
Why the count de Borda cannot beat the Marquis de Condorcet
Risse, Mathias - In: Social choice and welfare 25 (2005) 1, pp. 95-113
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003263117
Cover Image
The probability of inconsistencies in complex collective decisions
List, Christian - In: Social choice and welfare 24 (2005) 1, pp. 3-32
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002768125
Cover Image
Non-monotonicity does not imply the no-show paradox
Campbell, Donald E.; Kelly, Jerry S. - In: Social choice and welfare 19 (2002) 3, pp. 513-515
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001698237
Cover Image
On the (sample) condorect efficiency of majority rule : an alternative view of majority cycles and social homogeneity
Regenwetter, Michel; Adams, James F.; Grofman, Bernard - In: Theory and decision : an international journal for … 53 (2002) 2, pp. 153-186
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001722809
Cover Image
The probability of ties with scoring methods : some results
Marchant, Thierry - In: Social choice and welfare 18 (2001) 4, pp. 709-735
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001614181
Cover Image
The Strong No Show Paradoxes are a common flaw in Condorcet voting correspondences
Pérez, Joaquín - In: Social choice and welfare 18 (2001) 3, pp. 601-616
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001603723