A Cure for Discrimination? Affirmative Action and the Case of California's Proposition 209
An important claim made for affirmative action programs has been that they need not be permanent: they can be discontinued, the argument runs, once they have transformed employers' attitudes. Proposition 209, enacted in California in 1996 and made effective the following year, represents a natural experiment testing that claim. It ended long-standing state affirmative action programs not only in education, but also in public employment and government contracting. The author uses Current Population Survey data to gauge the labor market effects of this dramatic policy change. The key finding is that employment among women and minorities dropped sharply, almost wholly because of a decline in labor force participation rather than an increase in unemployment. This finding, the author argues, suggests that affirmative action programs in California either had been inefficient-that is, resulted in sub-optimal employee-employer matches-or had failed to create lasting change in employers' prejudicial attitudes.
Year of publication: |
2007
|
---|---|
Authors: | Myers, Caitlin Knowles |
Published in: |
Industrial and Labor Relations Review. - School of Industrial & Labor Relations, ISSN 0019-7939. - Vol. 60.2007, 3, p. 379-396
|
Publisher: |
School of Industrial & Labor Relations |
Saved in:
freely available
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Time Zones as Cues for Coordination: Latitude, Longitude, and Letterman
Hamermesh, Daniel, (2006)
-
Cues for Timing and Coordination: Latitude, Letterman, and Longitude
Hamermesh, Daniel S., (2008)
-
Why volunteer? Evidence on the role of altruism, image, and incentives
Carpenter, Jeffrey, (2010)
- More ...